Canada is one of the latest countries attempting to encourage organizations to adopt sustainable and governance-friendly business practices. With the passage and enactment of the “Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act”, which went into quick effect earlier this year, Canada hopes to increase transparency and supply chain due diligence. Due to its nature, the act is commonly known as the Modern Slavery Act, or MSA.
The act came into effect on January 1, 2024, and stipulates that organizations must submit a comprehensive report for the previous financial year by May 31 of the following year. This gives in-scope organizations little time to prepare for the increase in investigations they may need to undertake. In fact, the first reports were due May 31, 2024, surveying the organization’s forced and child labor risk mitigation actions in 2023.
Maintaining MSA compliance may require you to step up your supply chain due diligence and reporting capabilities, which may seem difficult at first, especially given the compressed timelines. However, following MSA requirements will also give your organization the chance to fully understand the implications of your value chain, and head off costly fines and reputational mistakes before they have the chance to affect your business.
What is the Canadian Modern Slavery Act?
The Canadian Modern Slavery Act is a new legislation that requires in-scope organizations to submit a report on the actions taken to mitigate forced and child labor practices within the organization’s supply chain. The report must be board-approved, publicly available, and be sent to Canada’s Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness by May 31st each year.
Penalties for failing to comply to the MSA can be pretty steep: any individual or organization that doesn’t submit a report, or produces false or misleading information within a report can be found guilty of a summary offense and be fined up to CAD$250,000. Individual liability extends to directors, officers, employees, and agents of an organization, so any person responsible for signing off on MSA reporting could be considered complicit in supplying false or misleading information. The MSA does have a defense consideration in the case of employees and agents; however, it is patently clear that the Canadian government will not take non-compliance lightly.